Monitored Alarm Systems

Max Mosley? He tries to argue that the search engines have to forget. Mosley, former head of the FIA ??motorsport organization just a few years ago when the British tabloids, led by World News posted some photos of "Mosley cites five workers sex "involved some RPG - women were dressed as prison guards, and he and the" prisoner "who should be punished. workers took a few pictures that have been leaked ... and Mosley was lawful. He sued the News of the World a few questions, and in fact "won" in the narrower issue of what kind of role, he was involved in. The document described as a "Nazi orgy", but Mosley (which is very sensitive to realize that his father, Oswald Mosley, was the leader of the British fascist party, and both Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels apparently attended the wedding of his parents) said that the configuration was one German prison camp, and there was nothing

Nazi

regard. He won that argument World News

had to pay a sizeable amount. The court also said that the story and the images invaded their privacy.

You can understand why he would be upset by such actions deprived of light, but once they are public, then what? Most people agree that the best thing to do is to recognize that the information is public, and advance in life, which allows people to gradually leave love. But Max Mosley. You seem to have devoted his life to force everyone to take explicit steps to ensure that the rich and famous, like him, can never be embarrassed again. Firstly, he argued that newspapers should be required to warn people before being famous on writing, which allows the use of celebrities and the court to block any story that If they do not like. Fortunately, the European Court of Human Rights rejected this request.

This has not prevented Mosley, however, who first used the recent "Leveson inquiry" (a response to the story after

World News hacking of telephone lines) to push for new rules requiring search engines to delete the photos once they are online. Thus began the second phase of Mosley's response to the article: he made a campaign against the search engines, in the belief that if we could force search engines to ignore pictures original story, the world can not forget. Though at the Leveson hearing, Mosley admits he was warned that taking the case to court, first, would renew interest in the issue, particularly in making private information in court documents public officials:

I mean, when I had my first meeting with a lawyer, they explained carefully that .... Taking the case to court, all private information that I complained was tested again in public, with all the press there, with the benefit of immunity from all that has been said, and, finally, all that no judge could remove the information public-private
. In fact, going to court, was the increase in the degree to which the public was aware of it.
Yet Mosley continues to believe that it is possible to remove these things from the public mind, and the way to do it, of course, is
Filter Google

. Thus began a campaign to both legal and magic arguing that Google should filter the content in question. It Leveson asked about the number of sites that his lawyers have "been able to close" and responds by accusing Google:



is in the hundreds. My lawyers would probably produce an exact figure. One difficulty is that Google have these automatic search engines if someone puts something somewhere, if you Google my name appears. We told Google, you should not do this, this material is illegal, these images have been outlawed by the High Court of England. They say we are not obligated to monitor the web and do not want to police the web, so we brought an action against them in France and Germany where the jurisprudence is favorable. We also plan to act against them in California.

But the point is that Google could stop this material appearing but they do not, or will not, as a matter of principle. My position is that if the search engines - if someone were to stop the search engines producing the material, existing sites does not really matter, because without a search engine, nobody is, is only a few them friends of the person who publishes it. The really dangerous are the search engines.

And so began his legal campaign required
Find best price for : --European----German----Gawker----fundamental----Google----Leveson----Mosley--