Monitored Alarm Systems

Michael Stevens would like advice on CD ripping time you never have to do it again

You wrote in another column: "My favorite strategy for the digitization of things (or CD burning), is to do the work so you don ' 'll ever do it again. "Please could you share their ideas on how best to do this?

Michael Stevens

convert or "rip" an audio CD into a digital file is a time consuming process, and there are at least two reasonable options. One is to make the Using a perfect lossless FLAC as (Free Lossless Audio Codec). The second is to make a copy that is so good that you will never be able to hear the difference. I chose the second option, and tracks encoded in 320kbps MP3.

FLAC

capture all information in the registration, but has two major drawbacks: it produces large files, not all portable music players can handle it. (. Unfortunately, Apple and Microsoft have their own lossless formats) MP3 codec, however, offers smaller files that almost all devices - PC, phone, MP3 player, CD player, etc. - can play. This is the closest thing we have to a universal music format.

could have used a speed below 320 kbps VBR (reality: VBR), and are not able to hear the difference between 196kbps MP3 and loss. However, using a slightly higher rate which means that when you buy a better team - as a high quality MP3 player - will not discuss issues that have been hidden before. As you may have found a good quality hi-fi and studio monitors battery packs can indicate faults in the music files that are inaudible to use conventional MP3 player with headphones or earphones. This applies to CDs as well.

also able to use a lower bit rate with the AAC file format, because it is more efficient than MP3. AAC makes a real difference in low flows, especially below 128 kbps, but makes no practical difference to 256 kbps speeds. I decided the CAA, because it was much less widely supported than MP3, and there are several versions of the CAA, and because I realized most people I've been using MP3. (If a large number of people who have the same problem, someone will produce a correction.)

When I wrote an article about it, find the music format of the future, back in 2007, I was optimistic about AAC. Apple had simply decided to offer 256kbps unprotected AAC files with DRM protected AAC 128kbps, I would not use, even if they were free. However, the FAA has not made the kind of progress we expected, and I have not regretted choosing MP3.

So what is the best way to extract the files? This topic has been discussed in considerable depth for at least two decades by people who are much more qualified than me, so I decided to take what many experts consider the best approach. It was to rip CDs with Exact Audio Copy (EAC) and LAME open source software, following one of the guides on hydrogen audio website: EAC and LAME. (The name stands for recursively, LAME is not an MP3 encoder.)
hard drive sizes have increased over the last twelve years and a half, we have 750 GB and 1 TB drives you used to have 120 GB or 150 GB disks. This means that the extra size of FLAC files - which can be about half the size of the original WAV files - is a minor problem. For comparison, a 24-bit versions of FLAC Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon (1973) occupies 239MB, while 320kbps MP3 version of my occupies 71MB.

You can find lost files without taking up too much space, but it depends on how many CDs you want to copy.
Although all devices will play FLAC, you can use these files to produce MP3, AAC, WMA and other lossy formats for mobile devices. Copy clone becomes the master copy of the CD, so you never have to fire again. If you need to 320kbps MP3 files to an MP3 player quality and / or versions of 128 kbps for a mobile phone, you can do at any time.

Find best price for : --FLAC----audio--