Monitored Alarm Systems

Here are two words that have nothing to go out together: "MP3s used." If you know anything about how computers work, this concept is intellectually offensive. The same goes for "ready e-book", "digital rental" and a number of other terms that have emerged from the desperate struggle of the content industries "to do the impossible: to adapt without changing

These concepts are totally imaginary, and yet treat them as if they were real and serious discussions on the details of its operation - as a debate on the best super mutant, but with multi-million dollar lawsuits. Copyright requires all claim that we do not know better. It makes us act stupid.

Take MP3s "used" for example. The idea is instantly sense and suggest that seems comparable to the question of how people go into television. A "use MP3" is indistinguishable from a "new", and on the Internet there is no such thing as a copy of an individual "moves" MP3 discrete from one person to another anyway . More generally, a "file" is not a "thing" at all - is a concept that is used to help organize and display the more abstract concept of "information" in many places and different states or magnetically recorded on a hard disk platter or transmitted by radio waves (not to mention the inner workings of a computer, where the data elements are deflected around between several different components and caches).

a "record" is

analogy

, and like all analogies, is incomplete. It breaks when you take too much, then it must be discarded, as there are only analogies for our convenience. "Moving" a file is also an analogy - in fact, copy and then deleting the original. Deleting a file is usually an analogy - the data is still recoverable, the team has only been in charge of pretending it does not exist.

The purpose of these analogies

impose limits on reality. We give up the ability to copy a file because it simulates the ability to move. We do not pretend information degrades as physical objects simply because we choose to conceptualize it. If we describe something as "the size of 10 football fields", not require having lines painted grill on it. There is a reason that stubbornly stick with analogies is called

torture

and every discussion on "used files" or the difference between the movement and the copy is another round nut.

due to copyright, we are asked to pretend that these analogies always binding. When "lend" a Kindle ebook, pretend that we

thing

far and have not for some time, when our device is actually simply refuses we access. When a library wants to offer e-books, must pretend to be a "limited number of copies available." When we buy software with an activation code, we claim that "only bought one" and therefore can only be in one place at a time. When you rent a digital movie, we say that "we need to give back . " We claim that we are stupid and that our devices have limitations that do not really exist.

But here's the real problem: the timing could not be a benefit to the consumer, content companies analogy throw out the window, and suddenly want to talk about reality. So you get things like ReDigi, the MP3 market just used to lose in court. MP3s ReDigi tried to simulate discrete elements

meet

the analogy of "Move a file" using a control system, so that when you sell an MP3 with somebody one, ensure you have removed your own copy. Though always suspected that he was condemned, at least it was more fascinating from a legal and political perspective, which could create a conflict between copyright and the rights of After all first sale., it is expected that the processing of digital files such as physical goods, we should at least be able to get the rights that come with it.


But this time, the labels wanted to emphasize the fact that there is no such thing as moving a file, noting that ReDigi support involved but participates also remove other copies - and the judge agreed. It is in fact ReDigi is not the only example. We already wrote about the crazy situation streaming TV and movies, where companies do things like set up a warehouse full of standalone DVD players arising from individual drives, or install a TV antenna on separate roof for each desired line current customer. They have to deliberately ignore the principles, technology and engineering common sense sufficient to meet all these analogies broken - and still face massive opposition of content owners and broadcasters in every step of the way.
Find best price for : --Copyright----ReDigi--