Monitored Alarm Systems

people began to awaken to the fact that companies like Google and Facebook have huge amounts of data on their users. This raises questions about who owns what not, and the extent to which users should have access. Hugo Campos is the same question on another type of personal data - which are collected by a cardiac defibrillator implanted in his chest:

"I have this little computer complex located in my body, but I do not have access to her," said Campos. "The best thing to do is patients can obtain a copy of the report sent to the doctor, and is designed for physicians and patients. Patients were left in the dark. "

as open data movement has shown, the great thing about the publication of raw data sets is that allows people to reach new and unexpected uses for them. It seems likely that access to the data stream of the same implanted devices that would allow all sorts of innovations in the field of personalized medicine digital, which develops Now fast.

may become a problem as computing power increases of implanted devices, the data become richer, and people begin to monitor and even control of their health problems through a software that runs on smartphones say. Of course they - and programmers to write applications - they want full access to data from any computer connected to them or within them.

Campos asks:



"Who owns the data collected in my body?" He said. "If the benefit of society, so that can be used for post-marketing surveillance? Or me, then you can make better decisions about my health? "
is the same kind of question that people are increasingly asking Google and Facebook, but this time, can literally be a matter of life and death.

Find best price for : --Campos----Facebook----Google--