Monitored Alarm Systems

SOUP / protect intellectual property and censorship of the Internet are gradually introduced to more new sources. PBS Newshour held a brief discussion, focusing on the area recent crisis. The debate between Steven TEPP, the official in the former Copyright Office, who left the ship to the largest organization in the world of lobbying, the Chamber of Commerce (who, with the MPAA has led the charge for the soup and protect intellectual property approved) and Larry Downes, author and consultant, whose excellent work both in the field of crisis and the soup / PIPA mentioned several times. Unfortunately, as expected, in 10 minutes, it is difficult for anyone to go into much depth. I think that Downes made a key point from the beginning to emphasize that these attacks are almost entirely the domain "symbolic" because the sites themselves are not captured.

And we will call the specific examples of how cheaters statistics TEPP: .

"The scope of the problem is incredibly great sites Rogue - those dedicated to the theft of U.S. intellectual property, creative and innovative products - more than 53 million visitors each year. 9 visits is every human being on earth. and estimated to be at least $ 135 billion in damages legitimate businesses. The products sold are manufactured locally and regulation, and can often be not only bad but harmful to the health of consumers. "

is misleading both in one short paragraph.'s Start with the claim of $ 53 million. Guess what? It is a Chamber of Commerce US-funded study a security firm MarkMonitor called piracy. And the data suggest serious problems with the study. First, the same study was based on Alexa, considered at least the right tool for measuring web traffic there. Second, the number of "hits" on any site is a special meaning - especially when it comes to discussing the real economic impact of these visits. Who cares how many visits there, if we know nothing of what you do on these sites Third, a large percentage of visitors come from all three sites: Rapidshare, Megaupload and Megavideo. There are three cyberlockers that the industry has declared a "rogue", but which have significant legitimate purposes. Rapidshare, in particular, has repeatedly ruled to be perfectly legal in Europe and the United States. The company follows the rules DMCA takedown and has many legitimate uses. Even in these calculations Rapidshare makes everything a joke. And none of these sites are involved in "selling" counterfeit goods that put American citizens at risk. Fourth, that "estimates to make at least $ 135 billion damage" is a number fully formed. The US Chamber of Commerce cites a report by MarkMonitor to support different. But that ' is not really a report or a study or something like that at all. Instead, it is to promote "white paper" (point of sale for example). "Seven best practices for the fight against counterfeit sales line "That the report entitled MarkMonitor ago that the" criminals "for the creation of e-commerce store" is likely to cost legitimate businesses $ 135 billion in lost revenue this year. "But the source of that number. Note that other statistics in the report are

home. What makes you realize that the $ 135 000 000 000 is essentially. TEPP But not mentioned. Fifth, focuses on "the products they sell." This is the highly viscous part so TEPP should be ashamed (if the man was not ashamed at all). The obvious implication of this is that when attached these different numbers - you have 53 billion visits to sites

selling counterfeit that can be harmful to consumers

. We have already noted that 53 billion are false - but even more so when combined with forged that last sentence. MarkMonitor is because the same report that we gave $ 53 million, also states that traffic to sites

false sale is a

tiny percentage 53 million dollars. Specifically, the same report that sites selling counterfeit goods are only 87 million a year ... or 0.1642% . It is 16.42%. Or even 1.642%. is

0.1642%

of the total. In other words, the sale of counterfeit sites ... in fact appear to be quite small.


sixth, even that of these sites involves the sale of counterfeit goods are of poor quality or dangerous. But it's crazy. Most of the counterfeit versions are just replicas which are practicable. They are not harmful in any way. So now we talk a lot unless

Find best price for : --Tepp--