The Battle For Net Neutrality Flares Up Again: But Which Countries Still Have It?
Net neutrality has suddenly become a problem again. This is partly thanks to terrific ideas on Internet regulation of the International Telecommunication Union, in particular proposals by the European Telecommunications Network Operators Association ETNO-- discussed recently at Techdirt. WCITLeaks new information Wikileaks (found in the net neutrality on the Europa website) provides the following data (pdf): To ensure more efficient use of networks and enable new business models that better reflect the future demand, Member States should support a new interface IP ecosystem that provides both the best performance of the effort and end to end quality of service delivery. QoS-based delivery allows the management of IP traffic based on their characteristics (ie, delivery requirements and recognized the value), which supports innovation to provide value-added service, better use of assets telecommunications operators.
This may seem harmless enough, but "support for innovation to provide value added service" is a coded way that telecommunications companies should be allowed to drop net neutrality, which is confirmed in one of the accompanying proposal, which says:
Art. 4
4.4
international telecommunications services operators cooperate in the development of international IP interconnections providing both , and the best service from beginning to end quality of service delivery. The best service is to continue to form the basis of the international exchange of IP traffic. Nothing will prevent trade agreements with differentiated quality of service delivery for development
The key phrase is the last ". Differentiated Quality service delivery, "is to ignore the net neutrality. The proposal to move away from net neutrality contrasts with the decision of the Netherlands to put into law:
The law prohibits the neutrality of providers of Internet traffic from interfering with its users. The law allows traffic management in case of congestion and network security, provided that such measures serve the interests of Internet users. A technical error in the law can still be corrected in a vote May 15 [It was].
addition, the law includes a provision against wiretapping, the restriction of Internet service providers to use technology wiretapping invasive, such as Deep Packet Inspection Packet (DPI). They can do so in limited circumstances or with the prior permission of the user, the user may at any time. The use of DPI gained much attention when KPN agreed that analyzes traffic users to gather information on the use of certain applications. The law permits wiretapping with a warrant.
IPR is one of the most intrusive of violating network neutrality, because it is looking into the data portion of an IP packet, and not only the head, which contains basic information such as source and destination IP. A recent study by a team from the School of Information Studies at Syracuse in universities explored the use of DPI to throttle BitTorrent connections: 
To better understand the use and scope of intellectual property rights implementation, the project uses a test data crowdsourcing monitoring network known as glasnost. An Internet user that runs the test can see if Glasnost BitTorrent is completely blocked by your ISP, idle (choke), or function normally. 
Find best price for : --Neutrality----Glasnost----BitTorrent----Internet--
0 comments:
Post a Comment