Monitored Alarm Systems

Many people have waited to see how the Judge Otis Wright finally decided, in the case of collateral was guardianship. As you know, Judge Wright began to see through the tricks and facades posts by Brett Gibbs and clothing, and finally ordered all appear in his court (twice). Hearings, it should be noted, are not good for the team and all its partners pledges actors. Although Wright may be a bit limited in what it can do for garment, seems to do everything it can to launch a book, you can from them, using random numerous references to Star Trek as it can get in strict order of 11 pages. The discussion provides details quite clearly. We will publish all the key elements of the discussion, as Judge Wright did not waste time and I'm sure many of you will enjoy:

Steele Hansmeier and Duffy ("Principles") are lawyers with law firms broken. Research easy money, conspiring to operate the business and trained AF Holdings and Ingenuity 13 entities (including consumables) for the sole purpose of litigation claims infringement of copyright. They created these entities to protect directors against potential liability and to give an appearance of legitimacy.


AF Holdings
Ingenuity and 13 have no assets other than the copyright of several porn movies. No officers or owners of these offshore entities, but managers are de facto owners and managers.



administrators began his crusade under copyright in 2010, the Pledge Act, which was also owned and controlled by administrators. Their litigation strategy was to monitor the activity of your BitTorrent downloads porn movies copyrights, record the IP addresses of computers downloading movies, to file a lawsuit in federal court to compel Internet service providers ("ISPs ") the identity of subscribers to these IP addresses and sending cease and desist letters to subscribers, offering to solve each claim for breach of copyright for about $ 4,000.



This national strategy was a great success due to statutory damages of copyright, pornographic theme, and the high cost of litigation. Most of the defendants have settled with administrators, resulting profits of millions of dollars due to the numerosity of the accused. These settlement funds lies in the accounts of the directors and not the accounts belonging to AF operations or Ingenuity 13. No tax was paid on this income.



for defendants who refused to comply, the administrators involved in the fraud trial designed to force liquidation. These lawsuits were filed repetitive complaints based on minimal evidence, calculated to maximize the benefits of colonization, minimizing cost and effort.

administrators showed little interest in giving these claims against a particular defendant. Instead of litigation, the case. When you press the discovery, administrators can provide misinformation, even to the Court.

Directors urged lawyers willing, like Gibbs, to pursue these cases. Although Gibbs is responsible for his own conduct before the Court, the directors their actions. In some cases, the Gibbs function in the narrow parameters that gave administrators, which he called "high-level lawyers."

Administrators have full control the whole operation of copyright litigation. Administrators define the strategy to use in each case, ordered their lawyers and witnesses involved in providing false information on the case and the nature of its operation and had any financial interest in the outcome of each case.

administrators stole the identity of Alan Cooper (2170 North Highway 47, Isle, MN 56342) . Administrators fraudulently signed transfer of copyright by "popular demand" by Alan Cooper company without your permission, saying it is a by officers AF. Alan Cooper is not shared AF and has no affiliation with the applicants other than his work as a gardener Steele officers. No other person named Alan Cooper due to AF or Ingenuity Investments 13.
• Gibbs ordered managers to commit the following acts before the Court: the complaints of infringement of copyright based on a single snapshot of the Internet activity files, the names of persons as defendants based on a statistical estimate state assignment copyright with a fraudulent signature. Administrators also asked Gibbs to process these requests if they remained profitable, and reject otherwise.
  plaintiffs have demonstrated a willingness to deceive not only this Court, but other courts have emerged. Representations complainants about their activities, relationships and financial interests ranged from feigned ignorance lies errors. But This disappointment is calculated so that the Court grant asylum requests early discovery, allowing plaintiffs to identify the accused revenue sharing and accurate one. Through these requests granted, applicants borrowing authority Court to pressure solution.

This last paragraph is the key to an Account. Given all this, Wright J. discusses what you can do. First, we examine the failure of the commitment of the team to "make sufficient" independent investigations to prosecute any person who violates the copyright had. However, he notes, their main concern is not the lack of research, but rather the attempt to transform a "cover" of this point, as well as "early investigation after the events of Gibbs and the poor there. "In fact, he calls Gibbs certain statements relating to the investigation" a blatant lie ".



Declaration Gibbs is a blatant lie. His statement seems to other statements made by the plaintiffs in this case and others, reasonable statements ring true, but the lack
Find best price for : --Judge----Team----California----Highway----Cooper----Alan----Internet----Ingenuity----Holdings----Duffy----Gibbs----Prenda----Wright----Otis--