Blog Archive

Blog Archive

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

postheadericon British Politicians: There's Child Porn On The Internet And Google Needs To Do Something About It

this again. Something goes wrong and someone think it is because of the "internet". Where to go? Google. If people see and / or do bad things, it must be Google's fault for not looking at the Internet pretty well.



Last call for ISPs and companies like "Google" to be more "proactive" in preventing access to illegal material is derived from the recent conviction former slaughterhouse worker Mark Bridger, who received a life sentence for the kidnapping and murder of five years in April Jones. Apparently, Bridger had seen a cartoon with a girl bound to be sexually abused by an adult only hours before removal. He also had several other images stored on your computer.

This horrible crime has led to a call to Google (and other unidentified) to intensify efforts to eliminate or block child pornography on the Internet.
Business Secretary, Vince Cable, has become the first government minister to intervene on the availability of "shocking" illegal child abuse images online, urging Google to do more to monitor explicit material.
cable said that Internet companies should act quickly to "cover anomalies" amid fears charities protection organizations childhood proliferation of indecent images online is to put more children at risk.

cable is not completely unreasonable ...
Cable admitted he was "very, very difficult" to police the Internet, but he added. "Mark Bridger seems to be influenced by seeing pornography child Ultimately, it must come from the public. If you see evidence of what happens to go to the police immediately. "
... but" difficulty "is not in the form of" take action. "
"I think probably that it is possible to do is to make the companies that host these sites, Google and the rest to be more proactive in monitoring what is there. "
Keith Vaz, chairman of the Foreign Affairs select municipalities in the house, threw his opinion on the subject as well.

"Mark Bridger The case demonstrated the need to take action to remove such content on the Internet," he said. "The committee has done in the past, recommended that the government establish a code of conduct with Internet service providers to remove material that violates the rules of acceptable behavior.'m Very disappointed that although the government has said that it would make industry on this issue, which is yet to see any action resulting from this. "
Google and other Internet service providers have had to take steps to address the problem, said Vaz. "The Internet service providers, search engines and social media sites are too laid back about what happens on his watch. Industry giants such as Google will accept responsibility

to monitor and intervene. "
But" industry giants such as Google "

and Control and intervention (not" responsibility "for the search engine, by the way).

On Friday, a top PR angrily denied that Google does not take appropriate measures to eliminate illegal and extreme their search results, which act as a gateway to the web for many users around the world.



first, Google complies with the illegal list of search terms and sites provided by the Internet Watch Foundation. In addition, images are illegal

and
locked (already published) and have nothing to do with their SafeSearch filter. Scott Rubin, director of communications for the global efforts of Google, said that illegal material such as child pornography is not that even if Google's algorithms.
"The SafeSearch filter, which is designed to prevent sexually explicit material of a sample in its search results, should not be mistaken or confused with our commitment to maintain. images of illegal abuse of our products are not simply rely on filtering technology to block images of child abuse. beyond

Find best price for : --Radio----Cable----Google----Bridger----internet--

0 comments:

About Me